GPS Technology

An explanation of what precision GPS (including RTK) means in practical terms, how it differs from standard GPS, and why positional accuracy matters for cart path enforcement and turf protection.

Cart-path-only days stress test enforcement systems. This guide explains why compliance breaks down, how messaging and accuracy affect golfer behavior, and what actually works in practice.

False alerts undermine golf cart geofencing by eroding golfer trust. This guide explains why they occur, how accuracy and buffers contribute, and what courses can realistically do to reduce alert noise.

Zero-buffer cart path geofencing removes artificial tolerance and enforces cart paths as mapped. This guide explains why accuracy — not stricter rules — determines whether this approach is viable.

Cart path geofencing is one of the most challenging forms of GPS enforcement on a golf course. This guide explains how it works, why buffer zones exist, and why accuracy — not mapping — determines success.

GPS drift is one of the most common — and misunderstood — reasons golf cart geofencing fails. This guide explains what causes drift on golf courses, how it affects cart path enforcement, and why accuracy matters more than mapping.

Golf courses and farms share a common challenge: protecting valuable surfaces while equipment moves continuously. This article explores how precision GPS - proven in agriculture—can improve cart management, reduce false alerts, and create fairer enforcement on the course.

Standard GPS systems often struggle with drift and inconsistent behavior on golf courses. Precision GPS solves this by delivering repeatable positioning, enabling more reliable geofencing, clearer enforcement, and a smoother experience for both golfers and staff.

Golf cart geofencing can be a powerful operational tool—or a source of constant complaints. This guide breaks down common use cases, enforcement tradeoffs, and the real-world factors that determine whether geofencing improves turf protection or creates friction.